Thursday, April 30, 2015

The Black Swan Your Broker Won’t Tell You About

The US Dollar as we know it, derives its value based on where it trades against a basket of other currencies. Some 56% of this basket is comprised of Euros. Because of this, moves in the Dollar and the Euro tend to be closely correlated.
So, when the ECB cut interest rates to negative in June 2014, capital began to flow aggressively away from the EU and into the US Dollar. This in turn kicked off a strong US Dollar rally.
Which in turn began to implode the $9 trillion global US Dollar carry trade.
Globally, the world is awash in borrowed money… most of it in US Dollars. The US Dollar carry trade is north of $9 trillion… literally than the economies of Germany and Japan COMBINED.
When you BORROW in US Dollars you are effectively SHORTING the US Dollar. So when the US Dollar rallies… you have to cover your SHORT or you blow up.
Below is a chart showing the inverse US Dollar (meaning that when the Dollar strengthens, the black line falls) and the Euro (blue line). Note that the two move almost lockstep together:
This situation is not over. The US Dollar carry trade did not clean itself out in the space of six months. Again, there are over $9 trillion in borrowed Dollars floating around the financial system. If the US Dollar continues to strengthen at a bare minimum 50% of this will need to be unwound.
If you’re looking for actionable investment strategies to profit from the coming collapse, we highly recommend you take out a trial subscription to our paid premium investment newsletter Private Wealth Advisory.
Private Wealth Advisory is a WEEKLY investment newsletter that tells you what stocks to buy, and what stocks to avoid to insure you see consistent gains. Our track record is rock solid with recent positions closed out with gains of 26%, 29%, and 37%… all held for six months.
In fact, we just closed two new winners of 20% and 52% last week!!!
And we’ve only closed ONE loser in the last 7 months!
You can try Private Wealth Advisory for 30 days (1 month) for just $0.98 cents
If you don’t like it… just drop us a line and you won’t be charged again. Everything you received during your 30 day trial (the reports, investment ideas, etc.) are yours to keep…

The Fed is Twice As Leveraged As Lehman Was


The 2008 Crisis was caused by too much debt/ leverage, particularly in the form of illiquid derivatives (mortgage backed securities get the most attention, but the derivatives market was well over $800 trillion at the time of the crisis).
To combat the financial crisis, the Fed did three things:
1)   Cut rates to zero.
2)   Abandon accounting standards.
3)   Engage in Quantitative Easing/ QE.
None of these policies represented “solutions” to the crisis. In fact, you couldn’t even accurately argue that they represented “containment.” What the Fed did was permit the very cancerous securities that nearly imploded the Wall Street banks to spread beyond from the private sector onto the public’s balance sheet.
You cannot cure cancer by letting it spread from one area of the body to the next. You cannot solve a termite problem by letting the termites move somewhere else in a house. So how could one argue that you could solve a financial crisis by letting the problems spread elsewhere in the financial system?
Consider mere leverage levels. Going into the 2008 crisis, the investment banks sported leverage levels in the 30-40s. Lehman was leveraged at 31 to 1. Morgan Stanley was leveraged at 30 to 1. Merrill Lynch peaked out in the low 40s.
Today, the Fed’s has $57.6 billion in capital and $4. 4 TRILLION in assets. That represents a leverage level of 75 to 1.
The Fed will argue that this leverage does not matter because it can print money to increase its leverage levels. This is technically true, but doesn’t alter the fact that the Fed has backed itself into a corner by buying up over $3.5 trillion worth of stuff… which the Fed has no idea how to exit.
Indeed, we know that Janet Yellen was “somewhat concerned about exit strategies”back in 2009 when the Fed’s balance sheet was $2 trillion or so. Today it’s more than TWICE that. One wonders just how “concerned” she is today, with the Fed’s balance sheet larger in size than the GDP foremost developed countries.
Even more absurd is the Fed’s ongoing issue with interest rates. Never before in history has the Fed kept rates at zero for 5+ years. But then again, never before has the Fed’s real taskmasters, the TBTFs, been sitting on over $180 trillion in interest rate based derivatives.
Those who shrug off these issues are overlooking the fact that the treasury dept. has ordered survival kits for employees at the TBTFs… while the New York Fed, has been boosting its satellite office in Chicago in preparation for potential market dislocations when the inevitable interest rate hike hits.
Indeed, nothing exposes the fallacies of the Fed’s policies of the last five years like its horror at the prospect of raising rates even a little bit. Rates have been effectively zero for five years. Today, the Fed is so concerned about what even ONE rate hike would do that it is actively preparing for potential systemic risk.
A second round of the great crisis is coming. The Fed didn’t fix 2008.; it simply set the stage for something even worse.
Smart investors are preparing now.
If you’re looking for actionable investment strategies to profit from the coming collapse, we highly recommend you take out a trial subscription to our paid premium investment newsletter Private Wealth Advisory.
Private Wealth Advisory is a WEEKLY investment newsletter that tells you what stocks to buy, and what stocks to avoid to insure you see consistent gains. Our track record is rock solid with recent positions closed out with gains of 26%, 29%, and 37%… all held for six months.
In fact, we just closed two new winners of 20% and 52% last week!!!
And we’ve only closed ONE loser in the last 7 months!
You can try Private Wealth Advisory for 30 days (1 month) for just $0.98 cents
If you don’t like it… just drop us a line and you won’t be charged again. Everything you received during your 30 day trial (the reports, investment ideas, etc.) are yours to keep…
To take out a $0.98 trial subscription to Private Wealth Advisory…

Best Regards
Graham Summers
Phoenix Capital Researc

Wednesday, April 29, 2015

Stock-Market Crashes Through the Ages – Part III – Early 20th Century


The 20th century could be categorized as THE century when communications took off and we started living in each other’s pockets. Lives had been ruined by war, trouble and strife. Wealth had been redistributed beyond belief. There were no longer just a few that were making the profits, but there were growing classes of people that wanted recognition.
They might not have got it until the second half of the 20th century, but the way things unraveled in the first half meant that people were not prepared to sit back and let things go into the hands of the rich landlords and the factory owners.
Rights had been acquired and they were being demanded. Women, workers, whoever they were, everybody wanted a piece of the cake. It wasn’t until the second half of the twentieth century that dabbling and buying shares, thinking you could strike it lucky and make a million, was going to become part and parcel of most people’s lives. Maybe that’s the whole problem. People betting on investments as if that was nothing more than a couple of whippets running round the race track on a Saturday afternoon, bag of chips in one hand and a pint of ale in the other. Flat cap and everything.
The markets don’t act like that. But, we allowed people to think that they could make a quick million bucks by investing what they had hidden under the mattresses for decades. Why did they need to worry anyhow, social security had been invented, we were looking after the destitute and not locking them behind the gates of Victorian workhouses and mental asylums. There was a safety net that had been created in society by the advent of the National Health Services (1948 in the UK) that we pride ourselves for inventing or the retirement schemes that we say will make pensioners’ lives better (Dankeschön, Mr. Bismarck).
As time went on in the 19th century the number of stock-market crashes increased.
That number increased even more in the 20th century. Information was accessible. Telecommunication technology was entering our lives as a daily piece of equipment. I could start to be absent and yet present at the same time. I didn’t have to be literally somewhere physically; I could be there almost in person via the transmission of my voice or an image. It was reserved for the elite at the start, but as the century progressed, it became more and more democratized. Later in the century, it would be possible to be completely present, and yet physically absent and I would be able to do it from the comfort of my own living room. Education was becoming more and more widespread. Newspapers were being read even by those that had not been able to read in the previous century (total circulation was at over 27 million in 1920 and households had papers delivered both in the morning and in the evening). Access to information meant the learning of events almost in real-time.
Stock Markets: Interconnected
Stock Markets: Interconnected
The 20th century saw an explosion in the number of stock market crashes. Here are a few of them. The ones that bit us from behind as we scrambled out of the markets sometimes to be left without a cent. One thing about it all was that the dream of the self-made man, the entrepreneur, the idea of striking it rich had really come into its own in this century! This is just the first half of the 20th century!
1. Panic of 1901
We entered the 20th century with a panic. The turn of the century has always been equated with great change, either good or bad. The Panic of 1901 was due to some extent to the fight for the control of the Northern Pacific Railway.
Stock Market: Edward Henry Harriman
Stock Market: Edward Henry Harriman
  • The Northern Pacific was a transcontinental railway (1864-1970).
  • Edward Henry Harriman who was the Chairman of Union Pacific attempted at all costs to monopolize the railway sector.
  • He attempted to buy stock en masse belonging to Northern Pacific Railway to take control of the company.
  • The NYSE was said to look more like a football field as the panic started and prices began to fall as people started to sell in sheer panic.
  • The market crashed and brought down with it the majority of US railway companies (Burlington and Missouri Pacific, for example).
  • The only one that was left still standing was the Northern Pacific. The run on their shares by Harriman had meant that people were selling all other shares like they were going out of fashion and attempting to buy into Northern Pacific.
  • One company’s loss became another companies gain and Northern Pacific increased by 16.5 points.
The crash spread to other companies. It brought the country into recession and was the first stock-market crash of the 20th century.
2. Panic of 1907
The Panic of 1907, is the Bankers’ Panic. The NYSE dropped by 50%. The reasons? Lack of confidence in the market and retraction of market liquidity by NY banks. The banks had lent out too much money in an attempt to purchase the United Copper Company and this caused loss of confidence and bank runs ensued.
  • The US had no central bank that would act as a lender of last resort at the time. President Andrew Jackson had let the charter of the Second Bank of the United States lapse in 1836. Money supplies fluctuated only in line with agricultural cycles. Money left NY in the autumn to purchase harvests and the only thing that made that money come back was a raise in interest rates.
  • J.P. Morgan shored up the banks and bailed them out; otherwise there might have been an even worse situation.
  • There was an attempt to corner United Copper, by purchasing large quantities of the stock of the company in a bid to be able to manipulate the price of copper afterwards.
  • Shares rose in the beginning from $39 to $52 per share. They reached $60 before they began to collapse.
  • Within just a few days, they ended up at $10.
J.P. Morgan had managed to shore up the banks for a while as they were suffering from lack of liquidity, but he was unable to do so indefinitely. The bankers tried to call a press meeting to persuade the papers that they were controlling everything. Even the city of New York needed $20 million otherwise it would go bankrupt.
Morgan said “if people will keep their money in the banks, everything will be all right”.
The banks were not willing to make loans (short-term) to brokers to carry out daily trading, worried that the stock would fall even more. Prices fell as a consequence on October 24th 1907. The President of the NYSE requested that the stock exchange be closed early to halt more losses. Closing the NYSE would mean even greater loss of confidence. So, J. P. Morgan decided to call the banks to a meeting. He requested $25 million and it was raised in 10 minutes flat! Not bad, really! But, it didn’t stop the free-fall.
  • 1907 caused the highest number of bankruptcies to that date in the US.
  • Production was estimated to have fallen by 11%.
  • Imports were down by 26%.
  • Even immigration dropped. The US was no longer the land of plenty (fall from 1.2 million immigrants to just ¾ of a million in one year).
  • Unemployment rose to over 8%, whereas it had been at under 3%.
3. Wall Street Crash 1929
Probably the most famous stock market crash of the entire history of the economy (apart from the one that we are living right now). The Wall Street Crash is also known as Black Tuesday. Since this date we have used Black days throughout our stock market crashes (Black Monday in 1987, orBlack Wednesday in 1992, for example).
Just like in the period that preceded the stock-market crash of 2008, there was a time of wealth, success, making money, sandwiched in between World War I and just before World War II. The roaring twenties. Innovation, dynamism, liberation, freedom.
Motion pictures abounded, the automobile became commonplace, electricity entered the homes of the middle-classes. Culture and lifestyles changed drastically. Everything became possible. Modernity had arrived. It’s strange that the period that preceded the stock market crashes of the 21st century was also a time of great change. We had invented and democratized communications to a point where we could carry it around in our pockets. We had changed the way we accessed information and we had it at our finger tips like no other generation had had before via Internet.
Speculation became the order of the day in 1929. The world investors were on a roll and it wasn’t going to end. Money could be had and it was short-time financial gain that was important. Making money and making it fast. But, even though we might not always apply the same knowledge today, what goes up must come down.
  • On March 25th 1929, it began with a mini-crash. This was only an omen of what was to come.
  • The National City Bank tried to shore up the losses by injecting $25 million into the market, stopping is descent into hell. But, it was all temporary.
  • The USA was showing signs of waning economically. The steel market was on the slippery slope and construction wasn’t anything more than just sluggish. The peak had been reached.
  • There were already 20 million cars on the roads, for example in 1929 in the US. Automakers sold4.5 million cars in the US market alone in that year before the crash.
  • General Motors had a net profit of $248 million. But, the peak had been reached, 1929 saw a dramatic drop. It was only selling 1/3 of the cars it had been selling prior to the crash on the domestic market. It took ten years to come back to the same level of profit and the number of car sales as in the period before the crash of 1929.
  • Although, it has to be said, even then, it was the shareholders that counted. The shareholders got dividends every single year from GM between 1929 and 1939.
The roaring twenties had roared on from 1920 until 1929. The Dow Jones Industrial Average had been multiplied by ten. Some even said that it was a “permanently high plateau” in September 1929. Very few are able to predict what the market will do, but nobody today, at least, would suggest for a second that we are going to be on a permanent high. That lesson has been heard loud and clear. The Dow jones reached its peak at 38.17 on September 3rd 1929.
The London Stock Exchanged collapsed when a British investor (Clarence Hatry) became the most hated man in the UK when he was jailed for fraud. Hatry was a London insurance clerk that had amassed immense wealth by profiteering during WWI. He was about to merge his companies into a $40-million affair called the United Steel Companies. But, the Stock Exchange Committee discovered that he had been borrowing ($1 million) without anything to back it up.
  • It was on October 24th 1929 that Black Thursday occurred. The NYSE plummeted 11%. Bankers managed to stop the landslide and purchase large quantities of stock well above the market price in blue-chip companies. It halted the free-fall. But, temporarily. The NYSE closed at -6.38 points.
  • The newspapers managed to report the news and Monday 28th became known as Black Monday.
  • Black Monday saw the DJIA spiral out of control. The US market lost 12.8% as trading opened up on the NYSE. It plummeted 38.33 points and closed at 260.64.
  • Black Tuesday, October 29th had 16 million shares being traded. The DJIA fell 30.57 points, to just 23.07. It lost 11.7%. In three days of trading the DJIA had lost over 30%.
What went horribly wrong? Speculation and certainly the belief that things would never end. Brokers were lending 2/3 of the face value of stocks that they were purchasing and that meant that in 1929 there was more money that was on loan than the entire currency in circulation in the USA ($8.5 billion). That smacks of something familiar when we think about the sub-prime crisis. The belief that housing prices could never fall and that we would always be on an upper, lending money left, right and center.
One other thing that we learned is that our worlds were interconnected. Falls in London, Tokyo and New York happened at the speed of light in 1929. What one did the other followed suit with. Only 16% of the US population had money invested in the stock market in 1929, but it was probably those that had the companies that employed the people that worked. The knock-on effect was enormous.
But people like Joseph Schumpeter and Nikolai Kondratieff believed through their economic-cycle theories looking at the way the market reacted that the 1929 crash was just acceleration in the cycle and it enabled moving towards the next one.
Stock Market: Nikolai Kondratieff
Stock Market: Nikolai Kondratieff
Stock Market: Joseph Schumpeter
Stock Market: Joseph Schumpeter

4. Recession 1937
Spring 1937 saw the US economy get back on its feet and the levels of economic activity were similar to pre-1929 ones. Unemployment was still relatively high, but that was nothing compared to the vertiginous heights of 1933 (25%!). In 1937 things went haywire for just over a year causing an economic recession in the US, with a knock-on effect in the rest of the world.
  • Unemployment was at 14.3% in 1937. It increased to 19%.
  • Manufacturing output fell by 37%.
  • Spending decreased and incomes fell by 15%.
  • GDP fell by 11%.
Economists fail to agree on the reasons (nothing surprising) as to the economic recession of 1937. Depends where you stand. If you are a Keynesian, you will believe that federal spending cuts brought about the recession, coupled with increased taxation. If you are a Milton-Friedman  man then it’s the money supply and the Federal Reserve’s tightening of it that is the instigator.
The 1937 recession was called the ‘Recession within the Depression’.

Conclusions

Some might say that the benefits of what we have gained over the past century are far better than the relatively few times that we had to wade through the nightmares on Wall Street and the Stock Market crashes that hit us full in the face at times.
Some might say that it was worth it as the market generated the wealth on which we prospered in the 20th century. But, they also resulted in depression, recessions and slumps. Recessions that brought about the rise to power of some of the worst dictators that the world had seen.
Recessions that brought about a fight for greed and a closing in upon ourselves in protectionist fear. But, the 1st half the of the century was nothing compared to the stock market crashes that were waiting in store for us once we would become really industrially connected and inter-connected. When we went global, when we reduced our barriers, when we travelled from point A to point B at supersonic speed, and when one push of a fat finger on a keyboard sent millions across the other side of the planet.
Stock markets were going to run in the second half of the 20th century at supersonic, virtual speed. We would enter the Big-Bang world of deregulation of the financial markets, abolishing fixed commission charges. But, behind the big bang was a black hole…

Monday, April 27, 2015

Indian Rupee Inverted Head & Shoulder Pattern



Sustain Above 63.9; Then Expected Target Range:  68.80-69.46 Against US Dollar

The above chart indicates that Indian rupee is forming “Inverse Head & Shoulders Pattern.” After the rise from Point A (51.36/$), the rupee reached higher to Point B (68.80/$). This pattern formation has been seen with the retracement at Point C (58.34/$), which is near to the 61.8% retracement of Point A-Point B.
The chart shows that Left shoulder pattern started from the high of 68.80 and tested the lower level of 60.84, which was a sharp correction but it bounced back again to test the level of 63.90. The rupee drifted lower after testing the resistance at 63.90 and touched the low of 58.34. It again re-tested the Neckline level at 63.90, forming Head of chart pattern. The Right Shoulder tested the lower level of 61.30, before reverting and is currently trading at 63.64 near the Neckline resistance of 63.9. If it breaks out then the further uptrend will be confirmed.
Calculating the higher targets, which is the difference from the Head (58.34) to the higher resistance Neckline (63.90), is 5.56 points. The Neckline breakout is expected at 63.90 and adding the difference (5.56), the breakout comes to 69.46 as an immediate target. The previous top of 68.80 is also considered as the target as the start of the Inverted Head and Shoulder pattern.

Sustain Above 63.9; Then Expected Target Range:  68.80-69.46 Against US Dollar

Friday, April 17, 2015

SBIN

SBIN Sell CMP @ 292.5 stop @ 297 tgt 28 - 278 - 270 - 260 positional


Wednesday, April 15, 2015

Reliance sell in range 910-920 stop@ 940 max stop @ 960 Target 800 - 750

Reliance sell in range 910-920 stop@ 940 max stop 960 target 800 - 750

Edited 17th April 9.45 : CMP 943 stop @ 960 and hold short can average short as Result will be out soon

Tuesday, April 14, 2015

"There Are Big, Big Problems" - The Shocker Crushing The Economy Revealed

We are grateful to Alexander Giryavets at Dynamika Capital for pointing us to something which is far more troubling than even the Atlanta Fed's collapse in Q1 GDP tracking: namely the latest Credit Managers Index for the month of March which "deteriorated significantly over the last two months and current readings stand at the recessionary levels not seen since 2008."
To be sure, we have previously shown the collapse in consumer debt as reported by the Fed, which as we noted, just suffered its worst month for revolving credit since December 2010 and explains "why the consumer has literally gone into hibernation - it has nothing to do with the weather, and everything to do with the unwillingness to "charge" purchases, which in turn is a clear glimpse into how the US consumer sees their financial and economic future."

It turns out it may not have been just a matter of demand: apparently something very dramatic has been happening in February and especially in March. Instead of spoiling the punchline, we will leave it to the National Association of Credit Managers to explain what happened:
From the latest NACM Credit Managers Index:
We now know that the readings of last month were not a fluke or some temporary aberration that could be marked off as something related to the weather. There is quite obviously some serious financial stress manifesting in the data and this does not bode well for the growth of the economy going forward. These readings are as low as they have been since the recession started and to see everything start to get back on track would take a substantial reversal at this stage. The data from the CMI is not the only place where this distress is showing up, but thus far, it may be the most profound.
You mean it wasn't the weather? "As was the case last month, the majority of the damage was seen in the service sector and this month it is going to be hard to blame it all on the weather or some other seasonal factor."
Ok, good to know that we were correct in mocking all those "economisseds" who say the recent collapse in seasonally-adjusted (as in adjusted for the seasons... such as winter) data was due to the, well, winter, a winter in which 3 of 4 months were hotter than average!
So what is going on? Well, nothing short of another recession it appears.
The combined score is getting dangerously closer to the contraction zone and has not been this weak in many years (going back to 2010). It is sitting at 51.2 and that is down from the 53.2 noted last month. For most of the last two years, these readings have been in the mid-50s and above—comfortable territory and generally trending up from one month to the next and now there is a very disturbing trend downward. The index of favorable factors slipped substantially, but remains in the mid-range at 55.4. That would be seen as better news if it were not for the fact that these readings had consistently been in the 60s during the last couple of years. It was only August of last year when the reading was a robust 63.8. The most drastic fall took place with the unfavorable factors that indicate the real distress in the credit market. It has tumbled from 50.5 to 48.5 and that is firmly in the contraction zone—a place this index has not been since the days right after the recession formally ended. The signal this sends is that many companies are not nearly as healthy as it has been assumed and that there is considerably less resilience in the business sector than assumed.
Of course, in a world in which the only economic growth comes as a result of new credit entering the economy (as opposed to Fed reserves being stuck in the S&P), the only thing that matters is how easy it is to get credit into the hands of those who need it. As it turns out it has never been more difficult to get credit.
No really!
According to the CMI, the Rejections of Credit Applications index just crashed the most ever, surpassing even the credit crunch at the peak of the Lehman crisis.
This can be seen on the chart below.

And without any new credit entering the economy, a recession is all but assured.
More details on what may be the most critical and completely underreported indicator for the US economy. The report continues, with such a dire narrative that one wonders how it passed through the US Ministry of Truth's propaganda meter:
By far the most disturbing is the rejection of credit applications as this has fallen from an already weak 48.1 to 42.9. This is credit crunch territory—unseen since the very start of the recessionSuddenly companies are having a very hard time getting credit. The accounts placed for collection reading slipped below 50 with a fall from 50.8 to 49.8 and that suggests that many companies are beyond slow pay and are faltering badly. The disputes category improved very slightly from 48.8 to 49, but is still below 50. This indicates that more companies are in such distress they are not bothering to dispute; they are just trying to survive.The dollar amount beyond terms slipped even deeper into contraction with a reading of 45.5 after a previous reading of 48.4. The dollar amount of customer deductions slipped out of the 50s as it went from 51.8 to 48.7. The only semi-bright spot was that filings for bankruptcies stayed almost the same—going from 55.0 to 55.1. This is the one and only category in the unfavorable list that did not fall into contraction territory and that suggests that there are big, big problems as far as the financial security of these companies are concerned.
For those who enjoy tables, here it is:

Just in case there was still confusion about what is truly going on when one strips away the daily "S&P500 is at all time highs" propaganda and iWatch infomercials, here is some more doom and gloom from the source:
As stated earlier, the real concerns start to manifest with the unfavorable categories. The rejections of credit applications fell out of the 50s with a resounding thud—going from 50.3 to 43.8. There is most definitely a credit crunch underway and it is now easy to determine what the prime factor is. There are many companies seeking credit that are too weak and there is obviously an abundance of caution showing up in those that issue that credit. The accounts placed for collection held fairly steady and that comes as a bit of surprise—it went from 51.8 to 51.4. The disputes category actually improved a little—going from 47.2 to 48.6, but the important point is that it is still in the contraction category. The dollar amount beyond terms slid drastically from 52.2 to 46.0 and the dollar amount of customer deductions remained stable but at a low rate—moving not at all from the 48.7 that was noted last month. There was also no change in the filings for bankruptcies as it stayed right at 55.1—same as last month.

The big news is access to credit. It is suddenly very hard to get and this looks like the situation that existed at the start of the recession in 2008. The overall economy didn’t look all that bad in late 2008, except that there was a dearth of credit and that soon led to business failures and struggles.

...

The pattern is the same whether one is discussing the manufacturing or service side—too many seeking credit that are not going to get what they are seeking—either because there are doubts as to their credit status or because those issuing credit are in a very cautious mood. The dollar collections category is more or less stable and still in the 60s—it went from 61.0 to 60.4.
And the stunner:
The rejections of credit applications is as miserable as it has been since the depths of the recession—going from 45.9 to 42.0.These are very bad readings and it will take a good long while to climb out of this mess.
No other commentary necessary.